ScanToScopeStart freeBuying
Ask any estimating vendor whether you need drawings and the answer is no. Ask what happens instead and the answer gets vague. Here is how to tell, from the website and from twenty minutes on a call, whether a tool can price a job that has never been drawn.
No card. Two scans, then you decide.
Search the phrase and the whole of page one is takeoff software. A ConstructConnect guide to AI takeoff players. A listicle of the nine best estimating tools. Easy Takeoffs, a free PDF takeoff product, two university lists of free takeoff tools, a Capterra listing for TakeOff Plus, a G2 category page for mechanical estimating, and an AlternativeTo page for Square Takeoff.
The top result is the honest one, and it is a video from STACK called No Drawings? No Problem, about estimating faster with manual takeoff inputs. Watch what that actually is. It is a form. You type in the dimensions instead of clicking them off a plan.
That is not nothing. If you have a tape measure full of numbers on the back of an envelope, typing them in beats drawing a plan you already have every figure for. But it does not answer the search. Somebody typing without takeoff drawings is not asking where to type. He is asking what to do about the fact that no drawing of this house exists and nobody is going to make one.
Every page on page one answers the first question. None of them answers the second.
The phrase is on a lot of marketing pages and it means four different things. Work out which one you are being sold before the trial starts, because three of the four leave the measuring exactly where it was.
Not the estimate, not the proposal. The first screen in the whole flow where a number exists. Watch whose fingers put it there. If it is the salesperson typing, you have your answer and the rest of the demo is about something else.
Ask it as a list. If the list starts with dimensions, then the product is an estimating tool and your problem is a measuring problem, and you are in the wrong demo. That is worth finding out in minute four rather than week three.
This is the question that separates the categories. Almost all of this software is built for your side of the door only. If the homeowner can never touch it, then somebody from your company is driving to every lead, and no software feature changes that.
Yours, or a database's. Both exist and both are legitimate, but they are different products and the directories list them in the same column. A tool that prices off a national average will be wrong in your market in a direction you cannot predict.
| Plan based takeoff | Room capture | |
|---|---|---|
| What it needs to start | A drawing, a PDF or a scaled plan | A phone that is already in the house |
| Who does the work | You or an estimator, at a desk | Whoever is standing in the room, including the homeowner |
| Best at | New build, commercial, anything with a drawing set | Existing houses that were never drawn |
| Where it breaks | No drawing exists, or the drawing is twenty years out of date | You need a measured drawing or a permit document at the end |
| What you still have to visit for | Site conditions the drawing does not show | The jobs you decide are worth winning |
Plenty of shops need both. The point is not that one wins, it is that the directories file them under the same heading and they solve opposite problems.
Somebody has to measure the room. That has always been true and no software has repealed it. The only question any of this turns on is who, and whether they had to drive.
What we do is move that job to the person who is already there. You text a link to the homeowner. She opens it in her phone browser with nothing to install and no account to make, and she walks the room. On a recent iPhone Pro it is measured with LiDAR as she goes. On any other phone it falls back to photographs plus the room sizes she types in, and the photos upload one at a time as they are taken.
A vision model reads those photographs and a model writes the scope brief. Then the scope is priced against your own cost book, line by line, with every quantity traceable to where it came from. The price is arithmetic, not a model's opinion and not a national average.
That is the honest version of estimating without a drawing. Not a text box with a nicer label on it.
Short list, and it is worth reading before you start a trial rather than after.
It is not bad at all once you have the numbers. The problem is that the search is about not having them. Manual input is the answer to a different question and it is being sold as the answer to this one.
Read the input list on the product page. Most of it reads a PDF plan set, which is a drawing. It is impressive work and it is for people who have drawings.
For a ballpark on the phone, yes, and plenty of good shops do. For a signed contract on an existing house, the variance between two basements of the same area is bigger than your margin.
Some will not, and then you are back to a visit. Most will, because she wants a price and this is the fastest route to one. Either way you have learned something about the lead.
No. It is built for houses that have never been drawn, which is most of the work a remodeler quotes.
Two scans free, no card. Then Solo at 79 a month for one user and 20 scans, Crew at 149 for five users and 60 scans, Shop at 349 for unlimited users and 200 scans. Extra scans are 4 dollars and nothing locks. Captures your own crew make on site are not metered.
Two scans free and no card. Pick the next enquiry on a house nobody has ever drawn, which is to say the next enquiry.